Back to Use Cases

Use Case

Evaluate capital procurement RFQ responses with cited requirement grading.

Use this workflow when technical fit, deviations, and award rationale all need to stay traceable.

Why It Is Hard

Capital procurement RFQs spread answers across many documents.

Technical fit, commercial terms, and deviations must be reviewed together.

Supplier responses may include questionnaires, drawings, engineering assumptions, contracts, and appendices that use different structures.

Reviewers need to grade the requirements while preserving the technical and contractual context behind each answer.

Requirement Review

Grade each requirement against the supplier's evidence.

Reviewers can check why a response was marked fulfilled, partial, or not fulfilled.

The platform links every material grade to the relevant response, attachment, or contract clause.

Technical, contractual, and operational deviations remain visible beside the affected requirement.

Award Review

Explain the ranking with the source material at hand.

Give procurement and technical reviewers the same record.

The comparison shows where suppliers meet the RFQ, where they differ, and which open points require clarification.

Authorized reviewers decide the weighting, ranking, and final award.